Learning Styles in High School Students Under the Objective-Based and Competency-Based Models
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize the learning styles (EA) of upper secondary education students and to compare the programs by competencies (propaedeutic) and by objectives (agricultural preparatory) of the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACh). The Honey-Alonso questionnaire of learning styles (Chaea) was applied with which four categories are evaluated: Active, reflective, theoretical, and pragmatic to identify the EA of 339 students (199 men and 140 women). with an average age of 19.2 ± 2.8 years, from the headquarters located in Texcoco, Tabasco, Veracruz and Yucatán. A database was prepared and analyzed with the JASP program. In addition, an analysis of variance was performed, the interpretation scales, the internal consistency was calculated and the correlation between the EA was evaluated. Similarity was observed in the averages of the reflective, theoretical and pragmatic styles and differences (P < 0.05) were observed in the average grades in favor of the competency-based program developed with propaedeutic (8.77 ± 0.74) and lower value in the program by objectives in high school (8.5 ± 0.54). The general results show that the active EA (11.8 ± 3.1) had the lowest score of the scale made. The reflective (14.7 ± 2.9), theoretical (13.6 ± 2.9) and pragmatic (13.6 ± 3.0) had similar values. All EA had a normal distribution and the internal consistency was acceptable. It is concluded that the reflective, theoretical and pragmatic EA of the programs by objectives and by competencies were similar. In the active style, the students by objectives had higher value than those of competencies.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In order to promote the development and dissemination of research in education in Latin America, the Ibero-American Journal for Educational Research and Development (RIDE) adhered to the Budapest Open Access Initiative, which is why it is identified as a Open access publication. This means that any user can read the complete text of the articles, print them, download them, copy them, link them, distribute them and use the contents for other purposes. Creative Cummons licenses allow users to specify the rights to use an open access journal available on the Internet in such a way that users know the rules of publication. Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions: Authors they keep the author's rights and give the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the attribution license of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use the published material whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this The authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that The work was published for the first time in this magazine. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work. low on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and to a greater and faster dissemination of the published work