Content validity analysis by judge’s criteria of an instrument to evaluate a manuscript

  • Rigoberto Reyes Valenzuela Tecnológico Nacional de México
  • Domingo Noé Marrón Ramos Tecnológico Nacional de México
  • Arturo González Torres Tecnológico Nacional de México
  • Rubén Juárez Rodríguez Tecnológico Nacional de México
  • Fátima Yaraset Mendoza Montero Tecnológico Nacional de México

Abstract

Given the high levels of demand in scientific journals that dictate having a successful editorial management, it is necessary to have tools that serve to obtain reliable evaluations, which will provide a competitive advantage within the field of research. The purpose of this study was to analyze the content validity by judging criteria of an instrument to evaluate a manuscript. This research was carried out in three stages: the first consisted of the theoretical bases. The second, he understood the design process. The third covered validity. The content validity was elaborated through a panel of eight judges and the Friedman test was used for the criterion validity. The findings of the present investigation show a significant agreement among the judges for the categories of clarity, coherence, relevance and sufficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2022-04-27
How to Cite
Reyes Valenzuela, R., Marrón Ramos, D. N., González Torres, A., Juárez Rodríguez, R., & Mendoza Montero, F. Y. (2022). Content validity analysis by judge’s criteria of an instrument to evaluate a manuscript. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación Y El Desarrollo Educativo, 12(24). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v12i24.1183
Section
Scientific articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)