Innovation and sustainability strategy for the development of Pluma Hidalgo, Oaxaca

Abstract

According to the indicators of marginality of the National Evaluation Council, the municipality of Pluma Hidalgo, Oaxaca, is one of the poorest in Mexico, which is why it is essential to promote initiatives that address their employment and nutrition needs. For this, however, some limitations of a scientific nature must be overcome to create or improve the mechanisms of transformation, adaptation and commercialization. The objective of this work, therefore, is to present a strategy based on the theoretical approaches of systemic competitiveness, innovation and sustainability for the use of the resources available in the aforementioned location. For this, a diagnosis was made to determine that in this community the levels of marginalization are very high, which are characterized by the following points: 1) although they do not have active workforce, they have resources with possibilities of being exploited, 2) the area is located in a strategic location, but lacks communication routes, both wired and wireless telephone services, and 3) they require training to transform the resources that can be exchanged with the other communities. The results show that the economic development of the population must consider the following four elements: 1) systemic competitiveness, in which all agents at the micro, meso, macro and meta levels participate in the competitiveness of a region, 2) microinnovation, in which  villagers with analytical skills for the well-being of the community recognize areas of opportunity to generate goods, which, when exchanged, generate the wealth that leads to economic development, 3) sustainability, so that wealth can be generated without undervaluing the productive capacities of the future, and 4) integral education to consolidate the permanence of the previous ones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Consejo Nacional de Evaluación [Coneval] (2010). La muestra del censo de población y vivienda 2010. El modelo estadístico 2015 para la continuidad del MCS-ENIGH y la encuesta intercensal 2015.

De la Vega, S. (2014). Para contender con la pobreza. CDMX. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana: Porrúa.

Esser, K., Hillebrand, W., Messner, D. y Meyer-Stamer, J. (1996). Competitividad sistémica: nuevo desafío para las empresas y la política. Revista de la CEPAL, (59), 39-52. Recuperado de http://archivo.cepal.org/pdfs/revistaCepal/Sp/059039052.pdf.

Gil, D. y Vilches, A. (2017). Educación para la sostenibilidad y educación en derechos humanos: dos campos que deben vincularse. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 29(1), 79-100. Recuperado de http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-3743/article/view/teoredu29179100.

Gómez, J., (2014). Innovación y generación de riqueza desde la perspectiva de la microinnovación. En Rivera, I. y De la Rosa, A. (coords.), La pyme a debate: perspectivas de estudio, mitos, actores clave, propuestas y vinculación (pp. 109-129). México: Gasca.

Gómez, J. y Rojas, E. (2017). Diagnóstico para el desarrollo de Pluma Hidalgo, Oaxaca. En Ramos, A., Martínez, R. y Trejo, G. (coords.), Políticas públicas de desarrollo sustentable (pp. 41-70). México: Gasca.

Luffiego, M. y Rabadán, J. (2000). La evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad y su introducción en la enseñanza. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 18(3), 473-486. Recuperado de https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Ensenanza/article/view/21701.

Naredo, J. (1994). Fundamentos de la economía ecológica. En Aguilera, F. y Alcántara, V. (eds.), De la economía ambiental a la economía ecológica. Barcelona: CIP-Ecosocial. Recuperado de http://www.fuhem.es/media/ecosocial/File/Actualidad/2011/Naredo.pdf.

Olmos, X. (2017). Sostenibilidad ambiental en las exportaciones agroalimentarias. Un panorama de América Latina. México: CEPAL. Recuperado de https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43286/1/S1700619_es.pdf.

Onat, N., Kucukvar, M., Halog, A. and Cloutier, S. (2017). Systems Thinking for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Recent Developments, Applications, and Future Perspectives. Sustainability , 9(5). Retrieved from https://res.mdpi.com/sustainability/sustainability-09-00706/article_deploy/sustainability-09-00706.pdf?filename=&attachment=1.

Rockström, J., Williams, J., Daily, G., Noble, A., Matthews, N., Gordon L., Wetterstrand H., DeClerck, F., Shah, M., Steduto, P., De Fraiture, C., Hatibu, N., Unver, O., Bird, J., Sibanda, L. and Smith, J. (2017). Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio, 46(1), 4-17. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13280-016-0793-6.

Rodríguez, E. y Gutiérrez, L. (2010). Políticas públicas vs pobreza. Espacios Públicos, 13(29), 8-25.

Wenche Aarseth , Tuomas Ahola, Kirsi Aaltonen, Andreas Økland , Bjørn Andersen, (2017), Estrategias de sostenibilidad del proyecto: una revisión sistemática de la literatura, Noruega, ScienceDirect

Published
2018-10-08
How to Cite
Gómez García, J., Rojas Alarcón, E., & Guzmán Ruiz, O. S. (2018). Innovation and sustainability strategy for the development of Pluma Hidalgo, Oaxaca. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación Y El Desarrollo Educativo, 9(17), 550 - 565. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v9i17.395
Section
Scientific articles