Validation by Expert Judment of an Evaluation Instrument for Evidence of Conceptual Learning

  • Manuel Arnoldo Rodríguez Medina Tecnológico Nacional de México
  • Eduardo Rafael Poblano-Ojinaga Tecnológico Nacional de México
  • Lizette Alvarado Tarango Tecnológico Nacional de México
  • Arturo González Torres Tecnológico Nacional de México
  • Manuel Iván Rodríguez Borbón Universidad Autónoma de Cd. Juárez

Abstract

This educational research work focuses on the validation of contents by expert judgment of an evaluation instrument for evidence of conceptual learning, specifically the Synthesis. For the design of the evaluation instrument, called Checklist-Synthesis, the criteria and quality conditions that a Synthesis must contain were identified, preparing a first draft aligned to the EC0072 labor competence standard. Subsequently, a group of six knowledgeable teachers evaluate the Synthesis Checklist on four criteria: Quality, Sufficiency, Coherence and Relevance. The empirical results reflect that ninety percent of the items evaluated were assigned a rating of four, the maximum value on a scale of one to four. Statistical analysis (Friedman test) confirms the agreement between the judges in three of the four criteria, so the evaluation instrument was revised and improved in the non-concordant criterion – Clarity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2021-06-04
How to Cite
Rodríguez Medina, M. A., Poblano-Ojinaga, E. R., Alvarado Tarango, L., González Torres, A., & Rodríguez Borbón, M. I. (2021). Validation by Expert Judment of an Evaluation Instrument for Evidence of Conceptual Learning. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación Y El Desarrollo Educativo, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i22.960
Section
Scientific articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>