Gender and Age Differences in Attitudes Toward Moral Subjects in Secondary School Students
Abstract
School violence in teen dating everyday as proactive and reactive aggressive reactions occur frequently in schools, there is a growing concern for the problems of school life, deterioration of interpersonal relationships and the prevention of gender violence in the Secondary Education schools. An important element to evaluate in these situations are the attitudes and interest in moral issues and predisposition to violence in secondary education students. Therefore, in this descriptive study presents the results of a questionnaire on values and attitudes in analyzing moral issues in terms of gender differences and age. Participants in this research were 490 secondary school students, aged between 11 and 15 years, with a mean age of 13.21 years (SD = 1.19). The results show statistically significant differences by gender and age, being able to see, in general, a greater tendency to decriminalize violence if in defense of self and less willingness to issue both prosocial behavior in boys compared with and girls in the group of younger teens. To conclude, we highlight the importance of early detection and assessment of attitudes and interests towards these moral issues with a view to comprehensive education aimed at improving social coexistence and the prevention of gender violence.
Downloads
References
Aierbe, A., Cortés, A. & Medrano, C. (2001). Una visión integradora de la teoría kohlberiana a partir de las críticas contextuales: implicaciones para la educación y la investigación en el ámbito moral. Cultura y Educación, 13(2), 147-177.
Blasi. A. (1993). The development of identity. Some implications of moral functioning. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Carlo, G. & Randall B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-45.
Carlo, G., Roesch, S. C. & Koller, S. H. (1999). Similarities and differences in prosocial moral reasoning between Brazilian and AngloAmerican college students. Interam. J. Psychol, 33, 151-172.
Consejo de Europa (2000b). Sites of Citizenship Brochure. Estrasburgo: Consejo de Europa.
De la Caba, M. A. & Etchebarría, I. (1999). Consistencia entre cognición y acción Moral: un estudio con adolescentes vascos. Psicología moral y crecimiento personal. Barcelona: Ariel Psicología.
Dodge, K., Coie, J., Pettit, G. & Price, J. (1990). Peer status and aggression in boys groups: Development and contextual analyses. Child Development, 61, 1289-1309.
Gilligan, C. (1985). Psicología moral femenina. Madrid: Debate.
González, F. (2002). Cuaderno a bordo. Madrid: Luis Vives.
Hoffman, M. L. (1987). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral reasoning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Krebs, D. & Van Hesteren, F. (1994). The development of altruism: toward an integrative model. Developmental Review, 14, 103-158.
Mestre, V., Samper P. & Frías, M.D. (2002). Procesos cognitivos predictores de la conducta prosocial y agresiva: la empatía como factor modulador. Psicothema, 14(2), 227-232.
Morales, F. M., Infante, L. & Galindo, A. (2003). Actitudes e intereses hacia Internet en una muestra de estudiantes de Secundaria. Encuentros en Psicología Social, 1(3), 3-6.
Ortega, R. (1995). Las malas relaciones interpersonales en la escuela: estudio sobre la violencia y el maltrato entre compañeros de segunda etapa de EGB. Infancia y Sociedad, 27-28, 191-216.
Ortiz, M. J., Agurrezabala, E., Apodaca, P., Etxbarría, I & López, E. (2002). Características emocionales, funcionamiento social y satisfacción social en escolares. Infancia y aprendizaje, 25(2), 195-218.
Peiró, S. (2009). Valores educativos y convivencia. España: Club Universitario.
Prieto, G. (2005). Violencia escolar y vida cotidiana en una escuela de secundaria. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 10(27), 1005-1026.
Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rest, J., Narváez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999a). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to moral judgment: An overview of Defining Issues Test research. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 291-324.
Rest, J. R., Narváez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999b). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schaffer, H. R. (2000). Desarrollo social. México: Siglo XXI Editores.
Trianes, M. V. & Fernández, C. (2001). Aprender a ser personas y a convivir. Un programa para secundaria. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
Turiel, E. (1983). The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Velásquez, L. (2005). Experiencias estudiantiles con la violencia en la escuela. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 10(26), 739-764.
Whiting, B. B. & Edwards, C. P. (1988). Children of different worlds: The formation of social behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
In order to promote the development and dissemination of research in education in Latin America, the Ibero-American Journal for Educational Research and Development (RIDE) adhered to the Budapest Open Access Initiative, which is why it is identified as a Open access publication. This means that any user can read the complete text of the articles, print them, download them, copy them, link them, distribute them and use the contents for other purposes. Creative Cummons licenses allow users to specify the rights to use an open access journal available on the Internet in such a way that users know the rules of publication. Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions: Authors they keep the author's rights and give the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the attribution license of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use the published material whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this The authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that The work was published for the first time in this magazine. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work. low on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and to a greater and faster dissemination of the published work