The role of emotions in electoral preferences according to educational level in Monterrey, Mexico
Abstract
The study analyzes how emotions, mediated by educational level, influence voting preferences in the 2024 mayoral elections in Monterrey, Mexico. Through an approach that combines correspondence analysis, sentiment analysis, and Sankey diagrams, the interaction between emotions evoked by political campaigns and voters' different levels of education is explored. Using data obtained from face-to-face surveys applied through multi-stage random probability sampling, emotional patterns are identified in preferences for candidates Mariana Rodríguez Cantú and Adrián Emilio de la Garza Santos. The results show that voters with a lower educational level respond predominantly to emotions associated with charisma and closeness, while those with a higher educational level value emotional aspects related to experience and trust in governance. This analysis offers new perspectives on how emotions and education interact in the formation of electoral preferences, highlighting the importance of understanding emotional factors for designing more effective political strategies in urban contexts.
Downloads
References
Banks, A. J. y Valentino, N. A. (2012). Emotional substrates of white racial attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 286–297.
Bosch, A., y Riba, C. (2005). Coyuntura económica y voto en España. Papers. Revista de Sociología, 75, 117-140.
Brader, T., Valentino, N. A. y Suhay, E. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 959–978.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., y Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cornelius, W. A. (1996). Mexican Politics in Transition: The Breakdown of a One-Party-Dominant Regime. University of California, San Diego.
Cramer, K. J. (2016). The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
Duch, R., y Stevenson, R. (2008). The economic voting: How political and economic institutions condition electoral results. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Fraile, M. (2005). Cuando la economía entra en las urnas. El voto económico en España (1979-1996). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Fraile, M., y Lewis, M. S. (2010). Economic voting in Spain: A 2000 panel test. Electoral Studies, 29(2), 210-220.
Harrop, M. y Miller, W. L. (1987). Elections and voters: A comparative introduction. Hampshire, UK: Macmillan.
Huddy, L., Mason, L. y Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17.
Informador (2024, 3 de marzo). Elecciones México 2024: Jóvenes de 18 a 29 años, el sector de la población con más electores. Recuperado de https://www.informador.mx/Elecciones-Mexico-2024-Jovenes-de-18-a-29-anos-el-sector-de-la-poblacion-con-mas-electores-l202403030001.html
Jaime, A., y Sáenz, J. L. (2007). Atribución de la responsabilidad y voto económico: el caso de España. Trimestre Económico, LXXIV(2), 379-413.
Jaime, A., y Sáenz, J. L. (2001). El comportamiento electoral en la democracia española. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Lago, I., y Montero, J. R. (2010). Participación y resultados electorales en España. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 130, 97-116.
LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Nueva York: Simon and Schuster.
Lipset, S. M., y Rokkan, S. (1967). Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press.
Liu, S., Li, F., Li, F., Cheng, X. y Shen, H. (2013). Adaptive Co-Training SVM for Sentiment Classification on Tweets. In CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management (pp. 2079-2088).
Lodge, M. y Taber, C. S. (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge University Press.
Marcus, G. E. (2000). Emotions in Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 221-250.
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., y MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R. y MacKuen, M. (2017). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Mehta, R., Mehta, D., Chheda, D., Shah, C., y Chawan, P. (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Influence Tracking using Twitter. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (IJARCSEE), 1(2).
Montero, J. R. (1994a). Sobre las preferencias electorales en España: fragmentación y polarización (1977-1993). In P. del Castillo (Ed.), Comportamiento político y electoral (pp. 51-124). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Montero, A. P. (1994b). Democracy and Democratization: Latin America in Comparative Perspective. Routledge.
Montero, J. R., Calvo, K., y Martínez, A. (2008). El voto religioso en España y Portugal. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 66(51), 19-54.
Nguyen, H. y Jung, J. (2018). SocioScope: A framework for understanding Internet of Social Knowledge. Future Generation Computer Systems, 83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.064
Pérez, C. y Santín, D. (2007). Minería de datos: técnicas y herramientas. Editorial Thompson.
Petersen, M. B. (2012). The evolutionary psychology of mass politics. Advances in Political Psychology, 33(1), 1–23.
Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. Nueva York: Harper & Row.
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. y Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever “get it”? Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–593.
Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K. y Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170.
Zarazúa, R. y Alvarado, E. (2020). Los medios digitales como herramienta de información en los votantes de Nuevo León, México. Revista Trayectorias, 22(51), 49-63.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In order to promote the development and dissemination of research in education in Latin America, the Ibero-American Journal for Educational Research and Development (RIDE) adhered to the Budapest Open Access Initiative, which is why it is identified as a Open access publication. This means that any user can read the complete text of the articles, print them, download them, copy them, link them, distribute them and use the contents for other purposes. Creative Cummons licenses allow users to specify the rights to use an open access journal available on the Internet in such a way that users know the rules of publication. Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions: Authors they keep the author's rights and give the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the attribution license of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use the published material whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this The authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that The work was published for the first time in this magazine. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work. low on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and to a greater and faster dissemination of the published work